On 7/9/2015 9:33 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Did anyone earlier ask the RFC Editor to change the reference format for RFCs from RFCxyzw to urn:ietf:rfc:xyzw? (I gather you are asking now, but objecting because it was not done when it was not asked seems strange. Remember that this has been brought to the communities attention several times in the past.)
Joel, shouldn't that be urn:isoc:rfc:xyzw? Bob Braden -- Robert Braden Internet and Networked Systems Division USC Information Sciences Institute 310.448.9173