Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Tuesday, July 07, 2015 08:10 +0000 "Eggert, Lars"
<lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> And if we have to add a "no_doi" option to the xml2rfc
> vocabulary to appease those that don't want their references
> polluted by DOIs, that's a possibility. Kinda silly, because
> we'd be spending development cash on a feature that probably
> few folks would care to use, but we could.

Unless the IAOC and RFC Editor negotiated a particularly unusual
deal with the chosen DOI Registration Agency, probably not.  In
general, signing up to issue DOIs carries with it not only a set
of charges but an obligation to use DOIs in one's own documents.


   john




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]