On 4 Jul 2015, at 11:29, John R Levine wrote: >>> 10.17487/RFC7556) >> >> Ok, then the format is already decided (although implicitly), and should not be changed. > > They're still opaque identifiers, so the format isn't important. I don't know how to make that any clearer. Because they have been published, we immediately have a question about persistence. We can now, from my perspective, not change the format as they have already been included in the RFC Index. Its a persistence issue. We COULD have changed the format, discussed it, or whatever, but that point in time is passed. Patrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature