On 7/7/2015 10:28 AM, John C Klensin wrote: >> Uh, no. I want it to be /easy/ to expand into those other >> uses. Not 'required' of course but easy if we wish to. > > Wfm, modulo the observations you have already made about the > costs of making supposedly-transitory documents permanent. You Huh? I did not make any comment about such a cost. > didn't include, e.g., Jabber logs of WG meetings in your lists, > but we could, in principle, apply DOIs to those too. That was the reason for the ellipsis, John. I wasn't trying to be complete and in fact my point about that was that trying to be complete right now is a mistake. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net