On 3/14/15 11:54 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > > > --On Saturday, March 14, 2015 10:06 -0700 joel jaeggli > <joelja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> For the recallable positions, the situation is much more >>> tricky because a recall petition needs 20 signatories and is >>> announced. Let's get real : if that happens, the >>> confidentiality *will* be breached. >> >> I don't think we can know that a priori. >> >> Our previous experiment with the recall process involved >> unavailability, not some causal condition. I don't think >> there's particular merit in spelling out how a recall will be >> iniatiated, as that is dictated by circumstances and the power >> to do is vested in nomcom qualified individuals > > Joel, > > First, we've had no previous experience with the "recall > process". The example I assure you are referring to was one in > which commitments to sign had been collected and it was clear > that the recall process would be initiated if the individual > involved did not resign, but he did. You are incorrect, the process was initiated. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg10887.html It was not necessary for it to run to completion. ...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature