On Mar 12, 2015 10:10 AM, "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/03/15 15:01, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> > I look forward to understanding what people think better than I do today.
>
> FWIW, I think we made the correct call in terms of keeping two
> different bits of process (ombudsteam and recalls) separated,
> but also accept that that might look entirely wrong to those
> outside the IESG, and I think we should take Sam's concern
> seriously as input on that.
Exactly. And said better than I tried to say it.
> So better wording would be good, and if that needs another LC
> to get community input on it, then that's ok too if we can
> constrain that additional LC to the things that have changed.
>
> S.
>
> PS: I've yet to properly read Dave's review, so not sure if
> there's stuff there that needs to be similarly addressed.