On 12/03/15 15:01, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > I look forward to understanding what people think better than I do today. FWIW, I think we made the correct call in terms of keeping two different bits of process (ombudsteam and recalls) separated, but also accept that that might look entirely wrong to those outside the IESG, and I think we should take Sam's concern seriously as input on that. So better wording would be good, and if that needs another LC to get community input on it, then that's ok too if we can constrain that additional LC to the things that have changed. S. PS: I've yet to properly read Dave's review, so not sure if there's stuff there that needs to be similarly addressed.