On 10/03/2015 21:59, Jari Arkko wrote:
I wanted to say that I’m in agreement with Adrian on this. Ultimately, no list will be complete, some judgment needs to apply, and I think we’ve covered this in the text better than if we attempted to expand the list. (And I am, of course, in agreement with Stewart that things that he lists are definitely important and certainly should not be misused in any professional discussion.) Jari
Jari I fail to see why the IETF which has no significant expertise in this area has chosen to make up its own list rather than using one put together by professionals. I did not just think up those additional items, they are part of a list that experts on the subject put together for example: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents However given the degree on integration on this subject I am sure it will align with EU position on the subject. This is very much a case where we should use the more encompassing list rather than an abbreviated one. The most glaring omission from the IETF list is of course disability. - Stewart