Re: Unhelpful draft names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Who is the owner of the draft the individual or the IETF?

What part of

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

is unclear?

Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Loa Andersson <loa@xxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 11 March 2015 7:49 PM
To: Abdussalam Baryun
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Unhelpful draft names

AB

Certainly if you want to submit a draft into an IETF owned repository,
IETF certainly have some rights to tell what file-name that can be used!

/Loa

On 2015-03-11 16:40, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> Who is the owner of the draft the individual or the IETF? IMHO only the
> owner has the right to make the name. The name may not be helpful to
> IETF but is may be helpful for the owner. IMHO the problem of
> unhelpfulness is because individual draft input should be distinguished
> per IETF Area and not per draft-name.
>
> So I suggest the IETF to fix the submission to ask the participant to
> submit per Area and choose any name.
>
> AB
>
> On Monday, March 9, 2015, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     It's one of those three days in the year when we get hundreds of
>     drafts announced
>     in succession, which makes the job of deciding which drafts a person
>     needs to
>     read harder than ever.
>
>     I have no idea what draft-xmss-00.txt is about and have no plans to find
>     out. But it seems to me that we have a fairly strong convention that
>     non-WG drafts should be named something like
>       draft-<author>-<generalTopic>-<specificTopic>
>     where the generalTopic is often a WG name, if there is a relevant WG.
>
>     Now I realise we don't want to be too rigid, e.g. the author component
>     is sometimes ymbk or farresnickel, but should we have a bit more
>     enforcement
>     in the tools, at least such that draft-oneWord-00 would not be
>     acceptable?
>
>         Brian
>

--


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@xxxxx
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]