On 9/1/13, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > At 23:19 31-08-2013, Eduardo A. Suarez wrote: >>I think both parties have to try to express clearly. Those who do not >>have the English as their native language should also try to do so. > > Agreed. > >>What is unbearable to me is that in more than one discussion in a >>mailing list someone's opinion is censored because misspell their >>ideas or opinions. > > I'll try and rephrase the above. In some mailing list discussions a > person's ideas or opinions are ignored because the ideas or opinions > are either not expressed clearly or the ideas or opinions are not > understood. I always think the problem of not understanding a message in IETF is not the fault of the transmitter, but it is the receiver's fault. The receiver SHOULD make more efforts to understand, or send a reply to request clarifications (specially in IETF WGs when discussing technical issues). The fault cannot be the used-language or the way the language is used, but the fault can be low performance of communication or low purpose of such work at receiver end. AB