Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, April 29, 2013 12:39 pm, Sam Hartman wrote:
> For what it's worth, I'm not finding the current discussion is providing
> me useful information for making decisions.  It doesn't really matter to
> me whether the problem is selection of WG chairs or selection of
> IAB/IESG/IAOC after WG chairs are selected.  I think it is valuable to
> attempt to improve both situations in parallel, and the sorts of
> conclusions being drawn from the statistical discussion we're currently
> having cannot possibly change my opinion on that issue.
>
> I'm not saying that my mind is closed to being changed; simply that I've
> considered all the possible conclusions that I think could be drawn from
> the analysis being considered and from my standpoint they don't affect
> how I'd feel about various proposals that could be brought forward.

  Sounds to me like you have the cart in front of the horse. You already
have in mind various proposals (interestingly left unstated) and are looking
for data that can justify them being brought forward. Apparently, this data
does not help you justify these proposals so you find no use discussing in
it. Maybe we should let the data drive the proposals instead of the other
way around.

  Dan.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]