On 10/05/12 16:35, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Thursday, May 10, 2012 15:59 +0800 Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:John, sorry, maybe I did not articulate myself precisely enough. I did not intend to say it would be published in real-time. What I wanted to communicate is that we would collect that data only during daytime and only with 2hours-granularity as it's only meeting attendance in which room you are (and publish it at any point in time later). However, we would keep it public indefinitely (in the proceedings).Good. My apologies for misunderstanding your intent.Like you, I am very cautious about broadcasting my travel plans. Plus, I am not only concerned about in advance and real-time, but also about broadcasting to the public places I've been in the past (or for that matter any personal information).But it seems to me that takes us back to Russ's summary in that it is normal, and arguably necessary, for a standards body to record --and make available to those who are interested-- the identities of those participating in meetings.
I do not dispute that.What I dispute is that "make available to those who are interested" necessarily leads to the need to broadcast the data (i.e. publish in the proceedings). As we did in the past, we can equally achieve this openness by requiring that an interested person requests this data (including then providing his own identify) as we do at the moment.
Best regards, Tobias
best regards,
john