--On Thursday, May 10, 2012 15:59 +0800 Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John, > > sorry, maybe I did not articulate myself precisely enough. I > did not intend to say it would be published in real-time. What > I wanted to communicate is that we would collect that data > only during daytime and only with 2hours-granularity as it's > only meeting attendance in which room you are (and publish it > at any point in time later). However, we would keep it public > indefinitely (in the proceedings). Good. My apologies for misunderstanding your intent. > Like you, I am very cautious about broadcasting my travel > plans. Plus, I am not only concerned about in advance and > real-time, but also about broadcasting to the public places > I've been in the past (or for that matter any personal > information). But it seems to me that takes us back to Russ's summary in that it is normal, and arguably necessary, for a standards body to record --and make available to those who are interested-- the identities of those participating in meetings. best regards, john