> From: Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxx>
> Given that we just saw a /16 sold for $12/ip, what makes you think that
> any carrier would open up a /10 allocated to them for the good of
> humanity, at a potential future asset loss of $50m?
I hear you, but... if these things are worth so much, why are the RIR's just
giving them away? (Rhetorical question: I know the answer.)
I mean, it really drives me a bit batty that, under current rules, ISP's
I1...In can all go to their RIRs, and each be given a block of space for
free, to support future customers, and under those current rules, the RIRs
pretty much _have_ to give them the space, but... we have a hard time giving
those same ISPs _one_ block instead, to share.
Too bad the RIRs can't say 'OK we changed our policy, no more address blocks
for free - but if you ask for one for a _shared_ purpose, that we can do'.
> From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx>
> I assume that there aren't any CPE deployed behind CGN today.
Well, I actually suspect there are - but other strategies are being used to
provide the address space for those CGNs (per-ISP 'public' space; 1918-space;
squatted space; etc, etc).
> a CGN deployment is a new deployment and the ISPs choosing to do this
> could make sure that their customers CPE can support class E addresses
I suspect that CGNs are not, by and large, targetted to entirely new
customers: if they were, it might work to say 'equipment you buy to connect
must meet standards A, B and C'. Rather, I suspect that as customer bases
grow, some ISPs don't have enough 'public' space to give one to each customer
any more, so they want to deploy CGN - and they need address space for the
chunk of fabric between the CGNs and the CPEs. In other words, its mostly
_existing_ customers who are about to be CGN'd.
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf