Re: "class E" (was: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bob,

On Dec 5, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> So a CGN deployment is a new deployment and the ISPs choosing to do this could make sure that their customers CPE can support class E addresses, upgrade the CPE firmware,

I think the ISPs are saying that there is a non-trivial base of deployed non-upgradable CPE out there now.

> or send them new CPE.  

This assumes either (a) the ISP is responsible for the CPE and/or (b) the ISP is willing to pay for this.  I'm guessing these assumptions aren't valid.  

Regards,
-drc

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]