Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-09-11 13:26, Eric Burger wrote:
> So should we move to a one-step process?

There is a detailed proposal for that at
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits-all-01.txt

I don't think the arguments have changed much since 2006.

   Brian

> 
> On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:33 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> 
>> Advancing a spec is done for marketing, political, process and other
>> reasons. E.g., to give a spec more legitimacy. Or to more clear
>> replace an older one. Nothing wrong with that.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]