Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Sunday, September 11, 2011 14:49 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2011-09-11 13:26, Eric Burger wrote:
>> So should we move to a one-step process?
> 
> There is a detailed proposal for that at
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits-a
> ll-01.txt
> 
> I don't think the arguments have changed much since 2006.

Well, yes and no.

To some extent, that proposal evolved into
draft-ietf-newtrk-repurposing-isd which, without John Loughney's
direct involvement, evolved into draft-klensin-isdbis.  Both of
those can be construed as "one level and explanation" proposals,
rather than "multiple levels and trying to make the situation
fit the categories" ones.

   john



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]