Maybe the majority doesn't care one way or the other - they will just go wherever the meetings are held in which case: let's make them easy to get to cheap decent food one roof (with other hotels near-by) cheap and easy to get to You could pick Rosemont, IL (next to O'hare) for every meeting (oops, sorry - misses on decent food). geoff On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:23 -0700, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > On 8/24/2011 1:18 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > As long as a relatively large percentage of IETF folks see meetings as > > an opportunity to sight-see, I don't think we'll see much support for > > rotating among a small set of major hub locations. > > +1 > > But it's worse than "relatively large percent". There's absolutely no minority > constituency that is vocal about wanting this to change. That's why I declared > myself giving up on this topic. > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf