On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:39 AM, John Leslie wrote: > Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Eric Burger wrote: >>> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: >>> >>>> Something like this: >>>> 8:30-11:00 Session I >>>> 11:15-12:15 Session II >>>> 12:30-13:30 Session III >>> >>> I really like it, as there are a bunch of post-IETF stuff, some of >>> which starts in the afternoon and thus conflicts with the IETF. >> >> I'd actually vote for NO meetings on Fridays... > > We have been trying to treat Friday as a "real" day for a year or so, > and it's only partly working. > > For IETF81, I'd have to rate the Friday TSVWG and V6OPS an a success > (though I was barely functional by then). Squeezing them into the > Monday-Thursday schedule would have made for serious conflicts. > > We need some improved paradigms... > > For one, I suggest we take remote-participation _seriously_ for the > Friday meetings. Many of us are waiting-for-Godot at airports on Friday, > and could certainly wear a headphone/mike and watch our laptop screens. > Meetecho seemed ready to manage that sort of thing. :^) That may work, but it does require that someone be at the meeting venue while the rest sit in the airport. --Tom > > -- > John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx> > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf