Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Eric Burger wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>> 
>>> Something like this:
>>> 8:30-11:00 Session I
>>> 11:15-12:15 Session II
>>> 12:30-13:30 Session III
>> 
>> I really like it, as there are a bunch of post-IETF stuff, some of
>> which starts in the afternoon and thus conflicts with the IETF.
> 
> I'd actually vote for NO meetings on Fridays...

   We have been trying to treat Friday as a "real" day for a year or so,
and it's only partly working.

   For IETF81, I'd have to rate the Friday TSVWG and V6OPS an a success
(though I was barely functional by then). Squeezing them into the
Monday-Thursday schedule would have made for serious conflicts.

   We need some improved paradigms...

   For one, I suggest we take remote-participation _seriously_ for the
Friday meetings. Many of us are waiting-for-Godot at airports on Friday,
and could certainly wear a headphone/mike and watch our laptop screens.
Meetecho seemed ready to manage that sort of thing. :^)

--
John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]