Re: China venue survey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Ben Campbell wrote:
> 
> Concrete example:
> 
> Would a presentation on how tor was used to bypass state controls on 
> news during the recent election protests in Iran be acceptable under 
> the terms of the agreement?
> 
> That would sound like a perfectly appropriate and timely plenary 
> presentation. And it seems to me to violate the plain language of 
> the agreement concerning "human rights". 
>

I am going to assume that such a presentation would be largerly 
technical, a case study with some political overtones, but technical 
nonetheless. I would not expect this to get you in trouble, no.

Now, if you were to call the China Daily in advance and announce that 
you intented to reveal (new) methods for circumventing state laws and 
you declared this an open BOF where members of the public were invited 
to come and listen to your (I am assuming) perfect Mandarin, then I 
can imagine you would politely be asked to refrain from this activity.

I am sure we can dream up other scenarioes, but at the risk of 
repeating myself: in the 68 meetings of the IETF that I have attended, 
I've never observed activity that would cause concern in the context
that we are discussing.


Ole
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]