At 05:44 PM 9/22/2009, Dave Cridland wrote:
On the other hand, I can accept as valid the suggestion that some people have made that the particular restrictions of speech that the PRC impose may restrict the scope of discussion that the IETF typically engages in. I suspect that it may not be so, and would hope that this can be determined, clearly, and in advance of any decision.
Dave -- I'll note that most of this thread started over confusion about the provision within the agreement, and folks asking "what's that mean"? If more of us knew what the provision meant, we'd be more informed to make a more knowledgeable choice in the matter. Lacking that additional meaning leaves many of us flopping in the wind...
However, I would note that I'm still concerned about the possible effects by and on remote participation. But you'll all have read my other comments, right? Dave. -- Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx - xmpp:dwd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/ - http://dave.cridland.net/ Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf