On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:11:15 -0500 John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > though one might > reasonably require that any volunteer have a firm expectation of > being able to attend f2f Nomcom meetings, participate in f2f > interviews, etc. (i.e., attend several meetings in succession > even if their earlier participation was less dense). I think this is a very important point. > > In addition, since Nomcoms seem to mostly evaluate and then > return incumbents (whether that is good or bad is a separate > issue; it is an observable fact), a case can be made that > evaluations from within the Nomcom about how I* members deal > with participants who do not routinely attend meetings could > actually enhance the Nomcom's effectiveness. > At the time Scott put me on the IPng directorate, I'd never attended a meeting... Meanwhile, you might be interested in the draft paper at http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papes/codebooks.pdf -- even if it cites a very different Unicode... --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf