--On Tuesday, 28 October, 2008 08:02 -0700 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >... > It is also a neat rebuttal to the claim that network effects > do not exist - as Margolis and co claimed in their laughable > tract. If the issue were decided on technical grounds alone > the US and Europe would have chosen the same base years ago. > The US has not moved to the superior Swan mount because the > short term switching costs outweigh the long term advantages. > Change is only possible when a technology disruption occurs > that negates the advantage of the legacy base. In the case of > lightbulbs it is compact flourescents and LED bulbs, in the > case of keyboards it would probably take really good > handwriting recognition. One could, of course, make many of the same observations about replacing SMTP and/or today's Internet mail formats with some newly-invented and improved system, replacing HTTP with something more elegantly designed based on what we know about computer systems today, etc., as well as failure to harmonize residential supply voltages around the world. Whether the problem is one of network effects or the related one of the costs of replacing/ converting a large installed base, the consequences are the same: mere incremental technical superiority is almost never sufficient to motivate an incompatible change. john _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf