On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Ted Hardie wrote: > Can you describe the difference between "early reviews > performed by active participants" and just "participation"? In my > mind, folks making suggestions and noting issues with a document during > the working group phase are WG contributors, not reviewers. How do > you see this? If the reviewer is not subscribed to the WG list, and does not intend to become subscribed to the list, yet does a review and sends comments for a WG draft, then I'd say it's in the former camp. Personally, I usually do that. And it's a PITA that most WG mailing lists where I try to send mail unsubscribed just throw the mails to a black hole or a moderation queue that's never flushed. This is why I Cc: the WG chairs on these messages. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf