At 10:55 AM -0700 6/3/08, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > >***************************START OF TEXT******************************** >4.2 Recipients of the review > >The list of recipients of the review is tricky to get right. The main >idea is to make sure all the relevant people receive the review. The >recipient list is determined mainly by the following factors > >* The timeframe of the review (early vs. late) >* The contents of the review (editorial vs. technical) > >Early reviews are usually performed by active participants of a working >group. Suresh, Can you describe the difference between "early reviews performed by active participants" and just "participation"? In my mind, folks making suggestions and noting issues with a document during the working group phase are WG contributors, not reviewers. How do you see this? Ted _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf