Hi Ted, Ted Hardie wrote: > At 10:55 AM -0700 6/3/08, Suresh Krishnan wrote: >> ***************************START OF TEXT******************************** >> 4.2 Recipients of the review >> >> The list of recipients of the review is tricky to get right. The main >> idea is to make sure all the relevant people receive the review. The >> recipient list is determined mainly by the following factors >> >> * The timeframe of the review (early vs. late) >> * The contents of the review (editorial vs. technical) >> >> Early reviews are usually performed by active participants of a working >> group. > > > Suresh, > Can you describe the difference between "early reviews > performed by active participants" and just "participation"? In my > mind, folks making suggestions and noting issues with a document during > the working group phase are WG contributors, not reviewers. How do > you see this? I see it just like you :-). The early reviewers are contributors and participants. The reason I made the distinction is because reviews are only one form of participation in the working group. There are other ways to participate in the working group * Editing documents * Keeping track of issues * Contributing text to sections etc. Thanks Suresh _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf