Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Frank,
   Thanks for your comments. Please see responses inline.

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> 
>> We would really appreciate
> [...]
> In the spirit of your draft:  s /one an author/once an author/ ;-)

Will fix :-)

> 
> As the draft says, the main thing is to get any reviews at all:
> A "negative" review means that somebody bothered to read it, and
> to note whatever attracted their attention.  I'm not sure if 
> that needs a separate "review netiquette RFC", IMO it should be
> a part of the "Tao", or the next Tao if it is not already clear.

Paul Hoffman is working on the TAObis. Maybe he can chime in on this.

> 
> Please use the term "review team" instead of "directorate".

OK. Will do.

Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]