Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:08 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:

> Try this one, quite non-hypothetical: a candidate for the IESG is
> contemplating switching jobs.  His or her current employer does not  
> yet
> know this.  It has a clear bearing on whether or not that person can  
> do
> the job of AD, but equally clearly should not be broadcast to the  
> world.

Indeed.  And this is one of the concerns with the confirming body
seeing information as well.  For example, assume that a willing
nominee for a given AD position wishes to complain about the
incumbent AD in their questionnaire and where the incumbent
went wrong with the area, and they both work same employer.
The willing nominee decides that providing some detailed
information on the issues at hand to the NomCom is fine because
it will be kept in confidence.  However, what they don't realize is
that there are folks on the confirming body that also work for that
employer, and they'd be reluctant (for any of an array of reasons)
to share that feedback if they knew those folks within their company
would see it..   This would apply equally in SMB's scenario.

Same sort of issue, quite plausible, methinks.

-danny
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]