Dave Crocker wrote: > > Well, that's such a reasonable question, I did a subjective review of > Proposed Standard RFCs for the last number of years -- ignoring that > most recent and going back to rougly RFC 2500 -- looking for acronyms > that were for significant IETF-generated efforts. > ... > A number of questions come to mind: > > 1. What additions or removals should be made to the list? add MsgTrk Tony Hansen tony@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf