On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:09:28PM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Bill Manning wrote: > > > as offical spokesmodel for the IETF in your role > > as Sgt at Arms, your you SURE you want to advocate > > the IETF abandon its published statement wrt there > > being ONE ROOT ... > > Our interpretation of "a sergeant-at-arms appointed by the > Chair is empowered to restrict posting by a person, or of > a thread, when the content is inappropriate and represents > a pattern of abuse" is apparently different, I don't see > an "official spokesmodel" in RFC 3005. > > I've no idea who is a sergeant-at-arms here at the moment, > and Ted certainly didn't post in this role. Correct me > if I'm wrong, "one root" is an IAB doctrine, isn't it ? > Did the IETF ever bother to confirm it ? > > Frank > my appologies to Ted, you happend to be the nearest lighting rod. Frank, to your question. RFC 3245 section 2.2 --bill Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf