I think it's time that the ietf@xxxxxxxx filters flag all messages with
the word "NAT" in it as spam. NAT discussions are always fruitless: we're
not going to get rid of it in the IPv4 world and using it even more than
today won't fix any of our problems, so NAT is orthogonal to any
high-level IETF discussion.
I can't decide if Dan Wing would think that flagging all IETF mailing list
discussion of NAT as spam would be a good thing, or a bad thing ...
... perhaps we should finish the BEHAVE specifications first? Otherwise, the
Last Call discussion may be a trifle strange.
:-)
Spencer, who is not unsympathetic to the proposal, only to the timing ...
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf