Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Cridland <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
From: David Conrad <drc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:48:00 -0700
Cc: IETF-Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <29508.1187904301.412535@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I'll take ease in renumbering over application transparency for any
large network.

I find this confusing as a concern - how often do you renumber?


How often do you want to change service providers?

Regards,
-drc


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Dave Cridland

References:
- RE: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Dave Cridland

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC
Previous by thread: Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
Next by thread: Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]