Re: The Internet 2.0 box Was: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Keith> Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
    >> If we can meet the needs of 80% of Internet users with some
    >> form of shared access there will be more addresses left for the
    >> 20% with greater needs.
    >> 
    Keith> with 2**128 potential addresses, this is not only
    Keith> unnecessary, it's harmful.  there's far greater benefit to
    Keith> be had by uniformity in address allocation, globally unique
    Keith> addresses, and consistent use of addresses end-to-end.


I'll take ease in renumbering over application transparency for any
large network.



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]