On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:53:33AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > In message <ed6d469d0511141114w652c55d3te7df6ec33e8526de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bill > Fenner writes: > >I've been pondering change tracking, in the context of copy-editing, > >but I haven't come up with a complete thought yet. > > > > CVS? Should the Secretariat make CVS archives available to WG > document editors? I've written a book and many joint papers via CVS; > it works very well for line-oriented ASCII input, whether XML, LaTeX, > nroff, or what have you. I think Bill was talking about making his editing plug-in display changes to the document as change bars or whatnot. But that's just my interpretation. WRT revision control software on I-Ds, I think it's an excellent idea, but authors should use whatever they agree on. IMHO, the IETF doesn't need to provide a system. CVS vs. RCS vs. subversion vs. $DIETY knows what is too much of a mess to wade into for the benefit. If the Secretariat is going to provide something it may as well be wdiff (ASCII/HTML) output which is human readable. IMHO. -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
Attachment:
pgpYBmEvGDtnf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf