Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <ed6d469d0511141114w652c55d3te7df6ec33e8526de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bill 
Fenner writes:
>On 11/14/05, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I would not mind swapping from to an XML package
>> provided it supported change-tracking, embedded comments,
>> highlighting, WYSWYG display, edit time spell and edit time
>> grammer checking, and was a simple to install and maintain
>> on XP.
>>
>> Is there such a package?
>
>My xxe plugin, http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/xml2rfc-xxe/, provides
>a few of the features:
>- embedded comments (with <cref>)
>- WYSIKLWYG (What you see is kinda like what you get) display
>- Edit time spell check
>
>It's based on the XMLMind XML Editor, which is an excellent
>cross-platform java-based XML editor, which is not open-source but has
>a free "Standard Edition" and an excellent "Professional Edition".  My
>plugin works fine with both, but certain features such as PDF output
>are limited to the Professional Edition.
>
>I've been pondering change tracking, in the context of copy-editing,
>but I haven't come up with a complete thought yet.
>

CVS?  Should the Secretariat make CVS archives available to WG 
document editors?  I've written a book and many joint papers via CVS; 
it works very well for line-oriented ASCII input, whether XML, LaTeX, 
nroff, or what have you.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]