So... not 100% sure I captured the result ciorrectly.
This is what we have in rev 04:
<section title="Divisional Accounting" anchor="divisional-accounting">
<t>
Funds managed by IASA shall be accounted for in a
separate set of accounts.
Separate financial reports, including a balance
sheet and a profit and loss statement for IASA alone,
shall be produced as directed by IAOC.
</t>
<t>
IAOC and ISOC shall agree upon and publish procedures
for reporting and auditing of these accounts.
</t>
</section>
This is what I have in my edit buffer for revision 05
<section title="Cost Center Accounting" anchor="cc-accounting">
<t>
As discussed with ISOC, funds managed by IASA shall
be accounted for in a separate set of accounts
within the Cost Center IASA.
A periodic summary of the IASA accounts shall be reported
in the form of standard financial statements that reflect
the income, expenses, assets, and liabilities of the IASA
cost center.
</t>
<t>
IAOC and ISOC shall agree upon and publish procedures
for reporting and auditing of these accounts.
</t>
<t>
Note that the ISOC in consultation with IAOC can
determine to structure the IASA accounting
differently in the future within the constraints
outlined in <xref target="isoc-responsibilities"/>.
</t>
</section>
Is that acceptable to everyone?
I have left the change to "General Ledger Accounts" out for the
time being, because I am not sure we have consensus on that yet
(even though ISOC prefers that terminology).
Bert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Margaret Wasserman
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 01:47
> To: Lynn St.Amour; Carl Malamud; Tom Petch
> Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand; Lynn DuVal; ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Resolution? #787 terminology - in particular "ISOC
> Standards Pillar"
>
>
>
> Lynn's suggested text is fine with me.
>
> Margaret
>
> At 4:53 PM -0500 1/25/05, Lynn St.Amour wrote:
> >Margaret,
> >
> >I agree with your point below but I do feel it is helpful to state
> >what ISOC's intended implementation is: a Cost Center within ISOC.
> >This should not override the section (principle) you quote below.
> >Perhaps we can add language at the beginning of this section to
> >clarify all this (or move the paragraph you quote from section 7 to
> >this section). We might also add some of the other language
> >proposed (see immed. below) so that the overall intent is clear
> >rather than focusing on the less important detail.
> >
> >"...periodic summary of the IASA accounts in the form of standard
> >financial statements that reflect the income, expenses, assets, and
> >liabilities of that cost center."
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Lynn
> >
> >
> >At 9:20 AM -0500 1/21/05, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >>There is a section of the BCP that says:
> >>
> >> Within the constraints outlined above, all other
> details of how to
> >> structure this activity within ISOC (whether as a cost
> center, a
> >> department, or a formal subsidiary) shall be
> determined by ISOC in
> >> consultation with the IAOC.
> >>
> >>It seems inconsistent with this section to mandate elsewhere that
> >>the IASA will be organized as a cost center, that we will use "cost
> >>center accounting", that the financial reports will include a P&L
> >>for the cost center, that we will publish the general ledger
> >>accounts, etc. These are details that, IMO, the IAOC and ISOC
> >>should work out (and change as needed to meet the needs of IASA and
> >>the IETF community) between themselves.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ietf mailing list
> >Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf