Re: Resolution? #787 terminology - in particular "ISOC Standards Pillar"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Revision 5 is ok with me.

Tom Petch

>
> This is what I have in my edit buffer for revision 05
>
>             <section title="Cost Center Accounting"
anchor="cc-accounting">
>                 <t>
>                     As discussed with ISOC, funds managed by IASA
shall
>                     be accounted for in a separate set of accounts
>                     within the Cost Center IASA.
>                     A periodic summary of the IASA accounts shall be
reported
>                     in the form of standard financial statements that
reflect
>                     the income, expenses, assets, and liabilities of
the IASA
>                     cost center.
>                 </t>
>                 <t>
>                     IAOC and ISOC shall agree upon and publish
procedures
>                     for reporting and auditing of these accounts.
>                 </t>
>                 <t>
>                     Note that the ISOC in consultation with IAOC can
>                     determine to structure the IASA accounting
>                     differently in the future within the constraints
>                     outlined in <xref
target="isoc-responsibilities"/>.
>                 </t>
>             </section>
>
> Is that acceptable to everyone?
>
> I have left the change to "General Ledger Accounts" out for the
> time being, because I am not sure we have consensus on that yet
> (even though ISOC prefers that terminology).
>
> Bert
>


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]