> From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > .... In fact we feel that we've been very considerate > > and open in the development of this draft in the language tagging > > community and continue to be open to comments and criticism, no > > matter the source. > > Based on what I have seen in this mailing list, I disagree. I'd be curious to know what has led to the impression that the authors have not been open to comments or criticism. > He is basically saying "You must publish our > BCP because we followed all of the steps as we understood them and the > default result of that is surely to publish." I am unable to see how you derive that from his message. Rather, he appears to be saying, if there is not enough consensus for acceptance of this draft, then surely we should be able to find a way for stakeholders to continue work together toward a draft that does achieve consensus. Peter Constable _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf