>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Scott> open from last version
>> I'd change "BCP publication" to "using its normal consensus
>> processes" (BCP is no magic term and may not survive the newtrk
>> process)
Scott> I did not see anyone speak up to support the use of the
Scott> term "BCP" yet the term (the meaning of which may change in
Scott> the future) is still used
I like the term BCP in this iinstance. I think it is more clear than
Scott's text.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf