Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Harald sez:
> We don't have a better formal term at the moment for "procedure document 
> where formal assertion of IETF consensus is required".

why not just say that?

   Removability: While there is no current plan to transfer the legal
      and financial home of the IASA to another corporation, the IASA
      shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the event that
      the IETF community decides, through the publication of a 
      procedure document where a formal assertion of IETF consensus 
      is required. (currently called BCP) ...

Scott

---
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 06:39:37 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP


--On 12. desember 2004 21:08 -0500 Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> open from last version
>
>> I'd change "BCP publication" to "using its normal consensus processes"
>> (BCP is no magic term and may not survive the newtrk process)
>
>
> I did not see anyone speak up to support the use of the term "BCP"
> yet the term (the meaning of which may change in the future) is still
> used

I support it.
We don't have a better formal term at the moment for "procedure document 
where formal assertion of IETF consensus is required".


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]