Harald sez:
> We don't have a better formal term at the moment for "procedure document
> where formal assertion of IETF consensus is required".
why not just say that?
Removability: While there is no current plan to transfer the legal
and financial home of the IASA to another corporation, the IASA
shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the event that
the IETF community decides, through the publication of a
procedure document where a formal assertion of IETF consensus
is required. (currently called BCP) ...
Scott
---
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 06:39:37 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP
--On 12. desember 2004 21:08 -0500 Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> open from last version
>
>> I'd change "BCP publication" to "using its normal consensus processes"
>> (BCP is no magic term and may not survive the newtrk process)
>
>
> I did not see anyone speak up to support the use of the term "BCP"
> yet the term (the meaning of which may change in the future) is still
> used
I support it.
We don't have a better formal term at the moment for "procedure document
where formal assertion of IETF consensus is required".
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf