I think that its really hard for the community at large to have opinions,
except for those with this undocumented anecdotal memory. My preoccupation is
that a lot of these behavior isues develop and grow because of the impersonal
nature of public mailing lists and are a lot easier to avoid and resolve with more human
friendly forms of interactions. Still then, they do require fast and good reaction
by others of course (WG-chairs for example). Conflict resolution (training)
might actually not be a bad topic for a WG-chairs lunch. And thats broader and
hence IMHO more useful than nitpicking on the respectively few extreme cases..
Cheers
Toerless
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 12:45:38AM -0500, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 6/12/2024 12:18 AM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > How common is it actually that "bad behavior" as discussed here
> > actually negatively impacted the resulting technical output of the
> > IETF ?
>
>
> It is impossible to take inventory of the contributions that would have come
> from people who have been pushed away from participating in the IETF by the
> hostile actions of bad actors. My intuition is that the IETF has lost
> significant input, and that its work output is suffering as a consequence.
>
> /a
--
---
tte@xxxxxxxxx
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
