[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action for Timothy Mcsweeney

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12-Jun-24 13:03, Adam Roach wrote:
On 6/11/24 17:25, Dan Harkins wrote:
  So let's rein this in a bit. No blanket bans. I don't know Tim
McSweeney from Adam and my opinion on this last-call is pretty
worthless given my current standing but unless there is a problem
on a list, people should not be banned.


In the general case, I agree. In this case, I think the following promise makes a blanket ban not just advisable, but entirely necessary:

But we don't have a rule that allows this. A PR Action *allows* all
list managers to ban the person; the IESG would have to go further
than all existing BCPs to do more than this. That's not impossible,
but would need a separate Last Call, I think.

   Brian



On 6/9/24 23:05, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
And Roman, if I were you, I would expand this ban to all of the lists because you can be sure that I won''t be participating in good faith on any other list after a ban.


/a


--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux