Jürgen, On 5/13/24, 11:56, "Jürgen Schönwälder" <jschoenwaelder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jschoenwaelder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>ersity> wrote: > "The padded PDU size for the encapsulated BFD control packets. > The minimum size is 24 or 26; see Section 6.8.6 of RFC 5880. > The maximum PDU size may be limited by the supported interface > MTU of the system."; > > > Perhaps you meant the "The size of encapsulated and padded BFD control > packets"? I may have also been mislead by the "minimum size is 24 or > 26" since this seems to be the minimum BFD control packet size without > any encapsulation. In the last sentence, did you mean the "maximum > padded PDU size"? How about the following? description - "The padded PDU size for the encapsulated BFD control packets. - The minimum size is 24 or 26; see Section 6.8.6 of RFC 5880. - The maximum PDU size may be limited by the supported interface + "The size of the padded and encapsulated BFD control packets + to be transmitted at layer 3. The BFD minimum control packet + size is 24 or 26 octets; see Section 6.8.6 of RFC 5880. + + The effective padded-pdu-size per BFD session will be + increased from the configured value to the minimum sized + packet for that encapsulation capable of carrying the BFD + control packet. + + The maximum padded PDU size may be limited by the supported interface > This may also be a failure of my non-native English language > processor. I appreciate your attention to detail on this point. :-) -- Jeff Juniper Business Use Only -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
