Joel Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Aspect 2: Where should the expiration be record, tracked, reported, etc.
> There is a reasonable argument that having that information in the draft is
> somewhat misleading. Having drafts say "check the datatracker", with or
> without stating an expected expiration date, seems useful. I can live with
> keeping the date in the draft. While I do not think it is worth the effort,
> I can live with removing the date from the draft, while being clear that
> process-wise, drafts still expire. However, as far as I can tell, that is
> not what the draft in front of us does. I would suggest that if someone
> thinks that change is worth making, they write a draft that explicitly makes
> it.
+1 on what Joel said.
(BTW: I am not favour of removing expiry dates, but I can live it)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
