hi Dan, You do realise you're posting to a public IETF mailing list, archived publicly on the web for anyone to read? And that, as a submission to the IETF, that access to your mail is authorised by the IETF? Yes, standardised corporate email signatures can be a fact of life for employees who don't get a say in policy for their organisations -- they're not CTOs with control over that, say, and many post as individuals from other addresses which can emphasise their individual contributor status, what they say over and above who they might work for -- but that disclaimer doesn't help you here. best Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx > On 28 Jul 2023, at 07:09, Dan Sexton <Dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The information contained in this email is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please inform us immediately and delete it and all copies from your system. Internet Watch Foundation does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent
