It appears that Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxx> said: >hi Dan, > >You do realise you're posting to a public IETF mailing list, >archived publicly on the web for anyone to read? And that, as a submission to the IETF, that access to your mail is >authorised by the IETF? Here in the US, disclaimers like the one below just mean "we don't have the foggiest understanding of privacy or copyright law" since they are completely meaningless. I gather that in the UK they are not quite as vacuous so prudence dicates that we delete his mail unread. R's, John > >> On 28 Jul 2023, at 07:09, Dan Sexton <Dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The information contained in this email is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. It is intended only >for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you >must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. Such >unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please inform us immediately and delete >it and all copies from your system. Internet Watch Foundation does not accept responsibility for changes made to >this message after it was sent >
