On 29-Jul-23 05:35, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxx> said:
hi Dan,
You do realise you're posting to a public IETF mailing list,
archived publicly on the web for anyone to read? And that, as a submission to the IETF, that access to your mail is
authorised by the IETF?
Here in the US, disclaimers like the one below just mean "we don't
have the foggiest understanding of privacy or copyright law" since
they are completely meaningless. I gather that in the UK they are not
quite as vacuous so prudence dicates that we delete his mail unread.
Not really. The mumbo-jumbo includes "If you are not an addressee...".
Everybody on this list is an addressee. IANAL, but I think you could
argue that when a destination is known to be publicly archived,
everybody with Internet access is an addressee.
Brian
R's,
John
On 28 Jul 2023, at 07:09, Dan Sexton <Dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The information contained in this email is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. It is intended only
for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you
must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. Such
unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please inform us immediately and delete
it and all copies from your system. Internet Watch Foundation does not accept responsibility for changes made to
this message after it was sent
