Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reading the list comments on the 'blog' over the last couple of days has been interesting and I'm glad that it spurred some conversation. I do feel that some commentators misunderstood or misrepresented my stance on a few things and those of the charity I work for. But hey, not the first time and I'm sure not the last either.

If anyone is interested in learning more about IWF's work, or why I'm at IETF (in person, again!) then please do reach out, I'd be happy to talk.

Thanks,

Dan Sexton
Chief Technical Officer

 

dan@xxxxxxxxxx
iwf.org.uk



From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 27 July 2023 13:08
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
 
Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The onus is on the IETF to engage in a civil and reasonable way,
> with clearly thought-through arguments on points of disagreement.

Well, that is kind of why these arguments go in a bad direction, right?

Usually these issues are raised with a sense of entitlement. For example, some participants think the IETF must adjust its specifications to accommodate the laws of their country, but I don't think they would stick up for Kazakhstan in the same way [0].

I am a US citizen. Some of the UK or EU laws are good in my opinion, but some are not. For example, the web is littered with cookie dialogs from the EU Cookie Directive, to the point that it is a feature[1] to hide them.

I do not think the onus is on the IETF here. Input from anyone is welcome, of course.

thanks,
Rob

 

 

TwitterInstagramFacebookLinkedIn

The information contained in this email is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please inform us immediately and delete it and all copies from your system. Internet Watch Foundation does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Internet Watch Foundation is a registered charity (registered number 1112398), and a company limited by guarantee registered in England (company number 3426366).

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux