On 4/10/23 15:22, Salz, Rich wrote: >> The reason why I do not think that using Git for that as a good idea is that there is no such validation after applying a commit for an informal text (English in our case), and so plenty of inconsistencies can be introduced by a commit. > > Have you done this or seen it in action, or is this just a theory? I saw that, without Git. I believe that using Git exacerbates that problem, although I do not have examples (hence my suggestion that it would be something useful to analyze), mostly because I refuse to use GitHub for anything I author (but not Git). > >> And that's without even talking about the fact that the "discussions" on GitHub are not AFAIK archived AFAIK by the IETF, and thus an easy way to shove a technology covered by a submarine patent in an RFC. At least email-based reviews are available forever in the IETF archives. > > The GitHub archives that the IETF makes include archives of the issues and PR's, courtesy of Martin's tooling. > Hmm, how do I download that with rsync? -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
